10 biggest reviews about Seaspiracy
Netflix’s latest documentary, Seaspiracy, turned the world upside down by revealing the grim truth behind the seafood industry. However, some have questioned the validity of claims made by Ali Tabrizi, who played and directed the controversial documentary.
While some agreed with the message portrayed by Seaspiracy, questioning only the way it was presented, others felt it was all a shady agenda to push veganism on everyone. Some common criticisms arose, regarding the accuracy of the located data, the practicality of the solutions provided, and much more.
ten The call to action is impractical
At the end of the documentary, the message is clear; people have to stop eating fish. After 90 minutes of observing millions of marine animals killed by commercial fishing vessels and as bycatch (unwanted sea creatures caught with a specific species caught), the decision to abandon the fish and turn to d other sources of food are almost obvious to some.
But, critics have argued that this call to action comes from a privileged position. For many, the fish they catch is their only food source, and giving up that means being hungry. In such cases, stopping eating fish is not only impractical, but also a direct threat to their very existence.
9 It’s vegan propaganda
Seaspiracy focuses on the dangers of fishing and the urgent need to stop eating fish. Meat, as a whole, has been called a destructive industry by some and people have been encouraged to switch to a vegan lifestyle instead.
Any validity of the claims made in the documentary was called into question by the call to action to get everyone to stop eating fish. The call was perceived by some as veganism imposed on people when the decision must be a free choice.
8 Includes interviews out of context
The documentary features several interviews with people and organizations involved in the fishing industry, such as Oceana and some government officials. In many of them, participants seemed to dodge questions or give half answers. Overall, most of their responses did not portray them in their best light or inspire confidence in what they were saying.
Following the release of Seaspiracy, some the people presented expressed themselves to have been distorted and to have their interviews and responses taken out of context.
7 It ignores the existence of sustainable seafood
Achieving and maintaining sustainability in all things is a goal that many have preached and few have achieved. The fishing industry has many organizations that have been declared sustainable by certain standards set by organizations such as the Marine Stewardship Council.
According to Seaspiracy, sustainable seafood does not exist. This claim was based on multiple interviews with organizations purported to offer sustainable seafood when their representatives couldn’t guarantee their processes are sustainable or dolphin-safe, as their labels suggested. Critics have argued that this claim rejects organizations that actually work towards the sustainability of their fisheries.
6 He goes from one problem to another
In the introduction to the documentary, Ali mentioned that he intends to show the negative impact humans have on ocean life. The first segment of Seaspiracy focused on highlighting the problem of plastic dumped in seas and oceans; from utensils and plastic bottles to straws and plastic bags. There were also plenty of grim statistics of sea creatures dying with bellies filled with plastic products from the sea and from climate change.
From there, Ali spoke of whaling, shark fin fishing, and then commercial fishing as an even more serious problem responsible for the majority of plastic products found in the sea. pointed out that this change of topic was also confusing as it combined different questions and made it difficult to follow or understand either.
5 He cites obsolete data
Besides the disturbing images of sea creatures dying by the thousands in Seaspiracy, the other most disturbing thing about the documentary was the statistics cited. In one case, Ali raised the possibility that the seas will be virtually empty by 2048.
Critics, however, took issue with this data, believing it to be inaccurate, outdated, and a misrepresentation of what was really going on was only meant to alarm people and move the vegan agenda forward.
4 He lacks balance
Seaspiracy The special focus on the fishing industry and its damaging impact on the world’s oceans has brought to light a problem many were not aware of. However, in an effort to make this point clear, many believe the documentary has become biased in favor of abolishing commercial fishing practices.
While it may be true that a lot of unsavory things and scandals happen on open waters, there are arguments that some large organizations are also doing good, but this was not shown in the documentary. The only exception is Sea Shepherd, a marine conservation group run by volunteers to protect marine life.
3 Fishermen were excluded from the conversation
One of the biggest critiques of Seaspiracy is that although this is a documentary about the practice of fishing, no fisherman was actually included in the conversation. There have been several interviews with organizations involved in sustainable seafood, but none with any of the people who actually fish on the water fishing.
As a key part of the industry discussed, the audience felt they should have had the chance to present their side of the story. The documentary mentions two fishermen who fished far from land in a small boat without life jackets, forced to do so to find food.
2 It ignores some of the good practices
The world is far from perfect when it comes to sustainability, but the efforts to make it happen cannot be overlooked. This is a grievance that many had with Seaspiracy. The Netflix documentary did highlight the horrific practices that are happening in the name of commercial fishing, but failed to acknowledge some of the good things.–few are they.
For example, some communities that depend on fishing for food and their livelihoods practice sustainable harvesting methods. On a commercial scale, there are reports of mathematics, computer models and scientific studies to ensure sustainable fishing.
1 The real cause of plastic pollution in the oceans
For years, the scientific community and environmentalists have warned of the growing problem of plastic pollution in the oceans. In Seaspiracy, the same problem is raised with a little difference. While plastic pollution from straws, bottles, plastic bags and other plastic products is bad, according to Seaspiracy, it is pale compared to the pollution caused by commercial fishing.
There are arguments that refute this, claiming that although the number is correct, it lacks context. Because fishing gear is bulkier, it shatters more slowly than plastic bags and straws, hence its dominant presence in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
NEXT: 10 Best Ocean Documentaries Like Seaspiracy
Boys: 10 times supes were actually heroes
About the Author