In a be aware to members of the European Parliament, Ursula von der Leyen’s crew warned that the amendments voted by MEPs in a textual content on fishing management may result in “large overfishing”. The Fee stated the transfer may result in “deterioration of fish shares” within the block.

EU lawmakers are calling on the Fee to vary the so-called share of error margin on fishing quotas from 10 to twenty % for small pelagic fisheries, similar to herring, sprat and marlin, and to 25 % for tuna species.

One of many keystones of the EU’s frequent fisheries coverage is the recording of the portions of fish caught by species.

These portions should be recorded, on the time of the catches, by the captain of the vessel, within the “logbook”, which is now digital – though these are estimates.

On the port, within the occasion of an inspection, the authorities examine the portions truly landed with these recorded within the logbook.

Fishermen have thus far benefited from a ten % margin of error, up from 20 % in 2009.

Setting, Oceans and Fisheries Commissioner Virginijus Sinkevičius warned: “The upper the tolerance, the higher the chance of underreporting, which is detrimental to the well being of our fish shares” .

As a way to defuse tensions between Parliament and the Fee, MEPs Clara Aguilera and Pierre Karleskind proposed a compromise.

The concept could be to maintain the ten % tolerance margin, however to use it to your complete quantity of fish caught and now not to every species.

READ MORE: London to ‘break away from EU rule’ with new Brexit monetary freedoms

An obvious compromise, which doesn’t persuade the chief.

For Vivian Loonela, spokesperson for the European Fee for the Setting, Oceans and Fisheries, “a tolerance margin for all catches and now not by species could be much more harmful for fish shares topic to quotas, in as a part of a combined fishery similar to tropical tuna purse seine fishing. “

She added: “Very harmful proposition”.

The dispute escalated when European fisheries physique Europêche despatched a powerful message to Commissioner Sinkevičius, making it clear that it’s not acceptable for the Fee to painting its personal fishing trade as unlawful predators and structural rule breakers.

DON’T MISS:
Boris lastly adopts EU guidelines and dismantles paperwork [INSIGHT]
Frustration of the Netherlands vis-à-vis the euro zone: “It would not work! [REACTION]
EU: Rutte requested ‘there should be a technique to go away the euro zone’ [ANALYSIS]

In accordance with Europêche, the Fee’s place unfairly calls into query the great general compliance report of the EU fleet, harms the picture of the sector, lack of empathy for fishermen and lack of reference to the realities of fishing .

As well as, the be aware despatched to MEPs clearly interferes with the position of impartial co-legislator of the European Parliament.

Europêche chief govt Daniel Voces stated that past the content material of the be aware which he says comprises half-truths and apocalyptic statements not primarily based on factual information, which is most surprising for Europêche is that the be aware appears to focus on solely a small group of friends. MEPs with no specialised curiosity in fisheries, with the obvious sole goal of producing political help and momentum to crush the parliamentary place democratically adopted by members of the PECH committee.

He stated: “EU fishermen and their organizations want to have an ongoing constructive partnership with the European Fee, however it appears more and more tough when DG MARE sees and describes its personal trade as a harmful drive.”

He added that Europêche perceives this angle as fueling a rising anti-EU sentiment throughout the fishing trade.

He stated these unfounded allegations add to the lengthy checklist of present issues that the EU fishing trade is already dealing with and for which it wants the political help of the European Fee and its commissioner. to fishing.

The results of Brexit, the implementation of the post-Brexit scenario within the North Sea and the North-East Atlantic, the spatial claims on fishing areas by renewable energies and marine protected areas in addition to the present impression on the Covid-19 market.

In view of the above, Europêche urged the Fee to cease casting a shadow of suspicion on the sector and its respect as a complete, in addition to to respect the democratic choices adopted by the specialised parliamentary committees.

Mr Votes added: “The talk on advanced and technical points, such because the management regulation, should be performed in a clear method and at all times searching for the results of rational insurance policies which, in the long run, must be utilized by fisherman.”

Further reporting by Maria Ortega