Johnson has a lot to say about fishing
FOLLOWING Jayne Adye’s excellent article in TCW last week, “Why are we still allowing the EU to plunder our fishing waters?” questions must be put to our Prime Minister and answers provided on fishing. In 2020 he gave assurances to our coastal communities, the UK fishing industry and MPs from all parties that he would not do as he did.
Johnson knew full well that leaving the fisheries negotiations to the very end would cause enormous difficulties for the 2021 arrangements. He had the nerve to claim that a lot had been done by recouping 25% of what we had previously. given.
What he did was put the UK fishing industry in a terrible position, giving the EU huge advantages over the next five years (no doubt for someone others are negotiating in a weakened position in 2026), while keeping us in the system of the common fisheries policy. and prevent our coastal communities from using our nation’s resources to get out of their depressed state.
Johnson was shown on Friday by Forces TV on the aircraft carrier’s deck queen elizabeth and talk about the ship’s upcoming tour and how the international law of the sea would be respected in the pursuit of a global Britain.
This, just months after ignoring the same law on our exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around the UK’s 200 nautical miles or center line.
The only reason EU fishing vessels operate in UK waters is our past membership of the EU. As we are no longer a member of the EU, full responsibility for our EEZ rests with our Parliament in Westminster. Nobody else.
Of course, the EU will try it to get what it wants, it does it with everyone, but other nations are holding on; we don’t. Why?
We know Johnson wanted a deal, but at the same cost as a former Tory prime minister, abandoning our living marine resources at the expense of our coastal communities?
Who has to gain? It’s not Brexit. Can anyone trust anyone at the top? It seems not.
If you enjoyed this article, you might be able to consider donating to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we do not receive any independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely on volunteers as the majority of our contributors do, but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We rely on our readers to help us, whether with regular or on-time payments. You can donate here. Thank you.